Skip to main content
HVAC technician inspecting old air conditioning unit
Equipment Guide Updated January 2026

When to Repair vs Replace Your AC: Texas Decision Guide

A 10-year-old air conditioner in North Texas has experienced wear equivalent to a 13-15-year-old system in moderate climates. Use this data-driven framework to make the right repair or replacement decision.

Dallas-Fort Worth's 2,756 cooling degree days—2.3 times the national average—means North Texas AC systems run seven months per year instead of four. This extended operation accelerates every form of equipment degradation: compressor wear, refrigerant leaks, coil corrosion, and efficiency loss.

The optimal repair-versus-replace decision hinges on three quantifiable factors: current repair cost relative to system age, cumulative efficiency degradation, and remaining useful life probability. For North Texas homeowners, the math often favors replacement earlier than national guidelines suggest.

Repair Costs by Component

Understanding typical repair costs provides the foundation for replacement calculations. The following data reflects 2025-2026 DFW market rates.

Major Component Repairs

Component Parts Only Total with Labor Notes
Compressor $400-$1,500 $1,350-$3,000 Most expensive; often triggers replacement
Evaporator coil $630-$1,700 $1,000-$3,700 Varies by size and refrigerant
Condenser coil $700-$2,000 $1,200-$4,200 High-SEER units cost more
Blower motor (variable) $500-$1,200 $1,000-$2,300 ECM motors cost 2x standard
Blower motor (standard) $200-$500 $500-$1,000 PSC motors more affordable
Condenser fan motor $100-$400 $400-$1,200 Common failure point
TXV (expansion valve) $150-$400 $400-$900 Requires refrigerant recovery

Minor Component Repairs

Capacitor $150-$400
Contactor $200-$450
Thermostat replacement $150-$500
Refrigerant recharge (R-410A, per lb) $50-$150
Refrigerant recharge (R-22, per lb) $90-$250
Full R-410A recharge $300-$800
Full R-22 recharge $800-$1,500+
Drain line clearing $75-$200
Electrical repair $150-$500

Texas Labor Rates

North Texas HVAC technician wages average $27-31/hour (Bureau of Labor Statistics). Consumer-facing service rates:

Standard hourly rate $75-$150/hour
Diagnostic/service call fee $75-$200
Emergency/after-hours service 1.5-2x standard rate

Source: HomeAdvisor/Angi DFW market data, January 2026

Industry Decision Rules

Two primary formulas guide professional replacement recommendations across the HVAC industry.

The $5,000 Rule

Multiply system age by repair cost. If the result exceeds $5,000, replacement becomes the financially sound choice:

System Age × Repair Cost = Decision Factor
System Age Repair Cost Calculation Decision
6 years $700 6 × $700 = $4,200 Repair acceptable
8 years $500 8 × $500 = $4,000 Repair acceptable
8 years $800 8 × $800 = $6,400 Replace
10 years $500 10 × $500 = $5,000 Borderline
10 years $600 10 × $600 = $6,000 Replace
12 years $400 12 × $400 = $4,800 Borderline
12 years $500 12 × $500 = $6,000 Replace
15 years $350 15 × $350 = $5,250 Replace

The 50% Rule

If repair cost exceeds 50% of a new system's value AND the unit is past mid-life, replacement is recommended.

Example calculation:

  • New system cost: $10,000
  • 50% threshold: $5,000
  • System age: 9 years (past mid-life of 7-8 years)
  • Proposed repair: $4,500

Decision: At $4,500, the repair is below threshold but close. Combined with being past mid-life, replacement should be seriously considered.

ENERGY STAR Guidance

"If your heat pump or air conditioner is more than 10 years old, consider replacing it with a unit that has earned the ENERGY STAR label. Installed correctly, these high-efficiency units can save up to 20 percent on heating and cooling costs."

ENERGY STAR further recommends: "If either your heating or central air unit is over 15 years old and one needs replacement, replace both at the same time."

Automatic Replacement Triggers

Certain situations warrant replacement regardless of system age:

⚠️

System uses R-22 refrigerant

Repair costs will only increase; R-22 production banned

⚠️

Refrigerant leak on out-of-warranty coil

Leak-and-recharge cycle is expensive and recurring

⚠️

Compressor failure on system 8+ years old

Major expense on equipment with limited remaining life

⚠️

Cumulative repairs exceeding $500/year

Pattern indicates systemic decline

⚠️

Multiple repairs within 24 months

Equipment entering failure cascade

Texas AC Systems Fail Sooner Than National Averages

ASHRAE establishes the national median lifespan for residential split AC systems at 15 years. However, Texas systems experience accelerated wear due to extended cooling seasons and extreme operating conditions.

Lifespan Comparison by Climate

Climate Expected AC Lifespan Annual Operating Hours
Mild (Pacific Northwest) 18-25 years ~400 hours
Moderate (Midwest) 15-20 years ~1,200 hours
National Average 15-20 years ~1,200 hours
Hot-humid (Texas) 10-15 years ~2,300 hours
Extreme (Arizona) 12-15 years ~2,000 hours

Source: ASHRAE Equipment Life Expectancy data, HVAC.com Texas lifespan analysis

Why Texas Systems Fail Earlier

Extended Operating Season

North Texas AC systems run April through October—seven months of continuous or near-continuous operation versus four months in moderate climates.

Extreme Temperature Exposure

Dallas-Fort Worth averages 17-20 days above 100°F annually. Recent years exceeded this: 55 days in 2023, 47 days in 2022, 71 days in 2011.

Continuous High-Load Operation

During 95°F+ days, systems often run continuously for 12+ hours. This maximum-load operation accelerates compressor wear and component fatigue.

Humidity Stress

North Texas's humid subtropical climate creates additional load on evaporator coils and accelerates corrosion throughout the system.

Age-Equivalent Calculation

A North Texas AC system experiences approximately 1.3-1.5x the wear of the same system in a moderate climate:

Texas System Age Equivalent Age (Moderate Climate)
5 years 6.5-7.5 years
8 years 10-12 years
10 years 13-15 years
12 years 15-18 years
15 years 19-22 years

Failure Probability Increases After Year 10

HVAC equipment follows the classic "bathtub curve" reliability pattern, with failure rates accelerating significantly in later years.

Failure Rate by Equipment Age

A Florida Solar Energy Center study tracking 46 homes over 4.5 years documented equipment degradation:

Age Range Annual Degradation Failure Characteristics
0-5 years 3.4% Mostly installation defects, electrical failures
5-10 years 8.3% Refrigerant leaks begin, bearing wear
10-15 years 6.8% Major component failures accelerate
15+ years 12.5% Cascading failures, compressor burnout

Key Finding: 26% of systems (12 of 46 units) required complete replacement during the 4.5-year study period, with median replacement occurring at 13.5-14 years of age.

Common Failure Points by Age

Age Range Primary Failure Points % of Service Calls
0-5 years Electrical (contactors, fuses, wiring) 31%
5-10 years Refrigerant leaks, blower motor bearings 28%
10-15 years Compressor, condenser fan motor 26%
15+ years Compressor burnout, cascading failures 15%

Compressor Failure: The Replacement Trigger

Compressor failure represents the most expensive and consequential AC repair. Expected lifespan: 10-15 years with proper maintenance.

Percentage of all AC failures

14-16%

Repair cost range

$1,350-$3,000

Preventable failures

Up to 80%

Primary causes

Refrigerant issues, electrical problems, lack of maintenance

When compressor failure occurs on a system older than 8-10 years, replacement typically proves more economical than repair.

R-22 Systems Require Replacement, Not Repair

The EPA completed the R-22 (Freon) production and import ban on January 1, 2020. Any remaining R-22 available comes exclusively from recycled, reclaimed, or stockpiled quantities.

R-22 Phase-Out Timeline

January 1, 2010 Ban on R-22 for new equipment manufacture
January 1, 2015 Ban on HCFC production except for servicing
January 1, 2020 Complete ban on R-22 production and import
Present Only recycled/reclaimed R-22 available

R-22 Cost Impact

R-22 prices have increased over 500% since the phase-out began:

Refrigerant Cost Per Pound Full Recharge Cost
R-410A $50-$150/lb $300-$800
R-22 $90-$250/lb $800-$1,500+

R-410A Transition Beginning

Under the AIM Act, manufacture and import of R-410A for new residential equipment was prohibited as of January 1, 2025. Existing R-410A systems can continue operating, but refrigerant costs will increase.

New equipment uses lower-GWP refrigerants: R-454B (GWP ~466) and R-32 (GWP ~675) vs. R-410A's GWP of 2,088.

⚠️

Recommendation

Any R-22 system requiring refrigerant-related repair should be replaced rather than repaired. A single R-22 recharge on a system with a leak often approaches or exceeds the 50% replacement threshold—and the leak will likely recur. The economics only worsen as R-22 supplies continue depleting.

Efficiency Degradation Adds Hidden Costs

Air conditioning efficiency degrades over time, even with regular maintenance. This degradation creates hidden operating costs that factor into replacement decisions.

NREL/DOE Degradation Formula

SEERdegraded = SEERoriginal × (1 - M)Age

Where M (maintenance factor) equals:

  • 0.01 (1% annual loss) with regular professional maintenance
  • 0.03 (3% annual loss) with minimal or no maintenance

Texas DHCA Weatherization Program uses 2% annual degradation. Florida Solar Energy Center research found median annual degradation of 5.2% in intensive cooling climates.

Cumulative Efficiency Loss

Starting from SEER 14 system:

Equipment Age Efficiency Loss Effective SEER
5 years ~20% 11.2
8 years ~32% 9.5
10 years ~40% 8.4
12 years ~48% 7.3
15 years ~60% 5.6

Cost of Running Degraded Equipment

15-year-old, minimally maintained SEER 10 system vs. alternatives (16¢/kWh, 2,200 cooling hours, 3.5-ton system):

Condition Annual kWh Annual Cost
Original SEER 10 9,240 $1,478
Degraded to SEER 6.3 14,667 $2,347
New SEER 16 system 5,775 $924
New SEER 20 system 4,620 $739

Key Insight: A degraded 15-year-old system consumes 57% more energy than its original rating and 154% more than a modern SEER 16 replacement—that's $1,423/year in excess costs.

ROI Calculations Favor Proactive Replacement

The basic payback formula oversimplifies the decision. Comprehensive analysis must account for avoided repairs, degradation trajectory, incentives, and reliability value.

Payback Calculation Example

Replacing degraded 12-year-old SEER 10 (actual ~SEER 7.5) with new SEER 18:

New system cost (installed, 3.5-ton) $11,000
Oncor rebate -$3,000
Federal tax credit (SEER2 17+) -$600
Net cost $7,400
Annual energy savings vs. degraded ~$1,100
Avoided repairs (estimated) ~$300/year
Total annual benefit $1,400
Simple payback 5.3 years

15-Year Total Cost of Ownership Comparison

Option A: Keep Old System 3 More Years

3 years electricity (degraded system) $7,041
Emergency repairs (estimated) $2,500
New system in 3 years (inflated cost) $12,500
12 years electricity (new SEER 15) $13,320
Maintenance (12 years) $1,800
Total 15-Year Cost $37,161

Option B: Replace Now with SEER 18

New system today (net of rebates) $7,400
15 years electricity $12,870
Maintenance (15 years) $2,250
Total 15-Year Cost $22,520

15-Year Savings from Proactive Replacement: $14,641

Financing Impact

Financing often makes replacement the superior monthly cash flow decision:

Scenario Monthly Cost
Keep degraded system (electricity only) $196
New system financed (60 months, 7.9% APR) + electricity $220
New system financed (84 months, 8.9% APR) + electricity $184

After financing payoff, monthly costs drop to electricity only ($72), creating long-term savings of $124/month.

Decision Framework Summary

Immediate Replacement Indicators

Replace if ANY ONE of these conditions exists:

R-22 refrigerant system needing refrigerant repair

R-22 costs only increase; repair is temporary

Compressor failure on system 8+ years old

Major expense on limited-life equipment

System Age × Repair Cost exceeds $5,000

Industry-standard replacement threshold

Repair cost exceeds 50% of replacement on mid-life system

Poor ROI on repair investment

Third repair call in 24 months

Equipment entering failure cascade

Strong Replacement Consideration

Consider replacement if TWO OR MORE of these conditions exist:

System age 10+ years High
Energy bills rising despite stable usage High
Comfort complaints (humidity, uneven temps) Medium
SEER rating below 14 Medium
Major component quote exceeds $1,500 High
No maintenance history available Medium

Repair Likely Appropriate

Repair makes sense when:

System under 8 years old with clean history

Substantial useful life remaining

Minor component failure under $500

Low cost, high remaining value

Equipment still under manufacturer warranty

Reduced repair cost

System properly sized and matched

Good foundation worth maintaining

Strong maintenance documentation

Equipment likely in better condition

Seasonal Timing Considerations

Season Advantages Disadvantages
Fall/Winter (Oct-Feb) Better scheduling, potential price flexibility, no emergency pressure None significant
Spring (Mar-May) Moderate demand, good availability Rising demand
Summer (Jun-Sep) Immediate need addressed Peak demand, higher prices, scheduling delays

The Maintenance Factor

Annual professional maintenance reduces efficiency degradation from 3% to 1% annually and can extend equipment lifespan by 50-100%. A Jones Lang LaSalle study documented 545% ROI on preventive maintenance programs. See our month-by-month maintenance checklist for what to do each season.

Maintenance Impact on Decision Threshold

Annual professional service Extend repair consideration by 2-3 years
Sporadic maintenance Use standard thresholds
No maintenance documentation Accelerate replacement consideration by 2-3 years

For a system approaching the repair-or-replace threshold: documented maintenance history suggests slower degradation (supporting repair), while lack of maintenance history suggests faster degradation (supporting replacement).

How We Sourced This Data

Federal Government

  • U.S. Department of Energy (energy.gov)
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (epa.gov)
  • ENERGY STAR (energystar.gov)
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (nrel.gov)

State Government

  • Texas DHCA (tdhca.texas.gov)

Academic Research

  • Florida Solar Energy Center, University of Central Florida

Industry

  • ASHRAE Equipment Life Expectancy data
  • Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA)
  • HomeAdvisor/Angi market pricing data

Need Help Deciding?

Our NATE-certified technicians will provide an honest assessment of your system's condition and help you make the right repair or replacement decision.

Serving Frisco, Plano, McKinney, Allen, Prosper, The Colony, Little Elm & Addison

Need help? I'm here!